Growing Our Own - More than a Lifestyle Choice
The story of the Cook and Gardener Partnership is about a community coming together to find a place for all of its residents to contribute to the well being of the community. We do that first and foremost by producing our own food. The following ideas form the basis for the services that Pat offers to the homeowner clients of CGP.
It begins with the thought that when
we produce locally what we consume locally we create cells of
sustainability. The shorter our supply lines the more resilient we
become. More importantly, sustainable cells produce a healthier and
more beautiful way of life.
When we decide to grow our own food, we
begin to reintegrate ourselves into nature's processes. Our western
culture has been separating humans from nature for thousands of
years. We tend to put each aspect of our lives into cubicles. We go
downtown to the office. We expect agriculture to be off over the
horizon. We “preserve” nature in special areas away from our
work and living spaces. Then we go home where we have little in
common with our neighbors. By growing our own food we bring a piece
of agriculture and a piece of nature home with us. If our neighbors
are doing the same, we will have that in common with our neighbors.
This is the beginning of what I call “a pattern of interactions”
that can build upon itself.
When we separate nature and agriculture
and business and housing, we prevent the resources produced in one
process from contributing to the productivity of other processes.
Each process imports resources and uses them up. The by products
become waste products and resources are depleted.
In an integrated system, all of the
products of an interaction can cycle locally. Food scraps from the
table can feed the chickens. Chicken waste can feed the worms.
Worms can feed the chickens. Worm castings can provide the nutrients
for vegetables. Vegetable trimmings can feed the chickens. The
chickens, eggs and vegetables can feed the people producing the table
scraps. This is called “closing the production loops”. That is the
way a system becomes healthy and how resources are conserved. A
closed loop system can increase its contained resources with each
process cycle.
There are no experts in what I am
writing about. Our culture emphasizes separation rather than
integration. We have thousands of knowledge specialties and few
generalists. We belittle the generalist as a “jack of all trades
and master of none”. But if we rely solely on experts we will
always suffer unintended consequences because the expert has little
knowledge of aspects of system function outside their expertise.
When experts give their opinion they
are speaking from a silo of information that forms the boundary of
their expertise. If you ask an agricultural scientist they can tell
you all about the chemicals you need to grow food in a sterile
system. They know no more than you about integrating agriculture
into a naturally healthy system. If you ask an ecology scientist
they can tell you all about the interactions in a natural system.
They know no more than you about integrating a natural system into a
suburban habitat. Every one reading this article is as qualified as
anyone else to figure this out.
Pat will be drawing on all the expertise in the community to integrate the processes in a way that closes the production loops for the partners of the Cook and Gardener Partnership and their homeowner clients.
Pat will be drawing on all the expertise in the community to integrate the processes in a way that closes the production loops for the partners of the Cook and Gardener Partnership and their homeowner clients.
Building a complex pattern of
interactions
Imagine a pristine woodland or patch of
prairie. What you see is beautiful and productive. It is a
collection of individuals of many different species living together
in the same space. Careful observation reveals a pattern of
interactions among the many species. Interactions involve an
exchange of nutrients. Each individual takes its turn as a consumer,
excreting nutrients through its life until it becomes the eaten. As
the nutrients cycle through all of the species the volume and variety
of nutrients builds to increase the vitality of the pattern (the
system). When we remove species from the pattern by logging, plowing
or using poisons, we reduce the vitality of the pattern and it loses
beauty and productivity. The capacity of the system to retain
resources is also reduced.
When a leaf falls on healthy soil,
bacteria and fungi begin to break it down. If the right species are
present the products of the leaf are taken up and passed around. A
particular atom of carbon from the leaf might cycle locally in the
soil for a long time before it is lost to the atmosphere again. The
length of time it takes depends on the number of species interacting
within that space. As the number of interactions increase the amount
of carbon tied up in the form of nutrients increases. As the
diversity of interactions increases, new forms of nutrients are
available to support new forms of interactions.
See: Carbon Cycling
See: Carbon Cycling
The same principles apply to an
economy. An increase in the number of interactions within an area results in an increase in the volume and variety of resources
available to engage in new interactions. The interactions can form a
feed back loop that builds resources into the economy. Not all interactions are based on market transactions. We can also think of partners producing for their own consumption. These new non-market transactions increase the complexity and resilience of the pattern.
Local production
of food using a complex pattern of interactions can eliminate waste
in the food system. By integrating humans into beautiful productive
living systems we also address climate change and poverty. By creating a way for all our residents to participate we address violence in our society.
Closing production loops
When we concentrate animals into large
facilities for feeding we increase the distance between the animal
and the food source. If you put 10,000 chickens in a single building
it becomes impractical to return the manure to the fields where the
feed is grown. Then the farmer growing the feed has to buy
fertilizer to replenish his depleted soils and the animal feeder has
a waste problem disposing of the manure. Because the volume of
manure is so great, the species who could have processed the manure
into fertility in the soil cannot do their job.
As a rule, the
further apart our processes operate the fewer places there are for
individuals of the many species to participate. The material that
could have been processed and the participation of the species that
could have done the processing are both wasted. Because of that
waste, resources cannot build up in the system. Without a resource
base we are more vulnerable to things that might disrupt those
production processes. What happens if the cheap supply of food is
disrupted?
Now think of owning the capacity to
produce what we value. Increasing fertility in our local ecosystems
creates a secure supply of food and a beautiful place to live. What
value should we place on that?
The problems we face as a society are
systemic. The problems derive from the way our culture has separated
things. The solution requires that we integrate system processes at
a scale where resources can cycle. It is entirely feasible to close
our production loops and integrate our production processes. When we
do, we create cells of sustainability. We are then less vulnerable
to disruptions in supply lines and our habitat grows healthier and
more beautiful with each production cycle. Each of you is as
qualified as anyone else to do it and it all begins with the choice
to grow our own.
As members of the community we all have the opportunity to help Chris and Pat with this important work. And as they succeed we increase our own well being.
I've found my people! Lol excellent and well written and succinct and exactly the conclusions I've come to and aim to work on. Thank you for this! I will be sharing this to my fb if that's okay ^_^ <3
ReplyDelete